SHOULD I STOP CONTRIBUTING TO MY RETIREMENT ACCOUNT?

Should I stop contributing to my retirement account since we’re getting divorced? If this question has ever crossed your mind, don’t feel like you’re being sneaky. You’re not alone – nearly every client who comes to our offices asks this question. If your divorce court has not already issued an order restraining either spouse from changing retirement contributions, which many do at the outset of the case, then you do have options; and, if you are not yet divorcing, you have even more. Of course, you should always discuss your options with an attorney and, preferably, a financial planner, too. But there are common, universal pros and cons to changing retirement contributions. Here are a few:

 

Enrollment/Plan Periods: Check your plan for defined periods of time in which you can enroll, terminate or change your contribution amounts. For personal retirement accounts unrelated to your employment, this may be as simple as changing your deposit amounts online or calling your account manager. For employer-provided retirement accounts, the process can be more cumbersome, and you may find yourself having to wait for the new period to begin, and filing out several forms when it does. Check your plan, and you may find out the decision is already made for you.

 

Bankruptcy: If you are contemplating bankruptcy, you may want to continue your contributions. Generally, the more you have set aside in your retirement account, the better, because your retirement savings are exempt from liquidation in the bankruptcy court. This means, you do not have to use your retirement savings to pay your creditors, and you get to walk away from them with most, if not all, of your retirement savings in-tact. Beware, however, that you cannot cheat the system by pouring all of your money into your retirement account; the bankruptcy court may void the additional contributions and give that money to your creditors. If either spouse is headed toward bankruptcy after divorce, therefore, you may want to continue contributions at the maximum allowed amount – after discussing your options and risks with your divorce attorney and your bankruptcy attorney, of course.

 

Available Funds: Contributions to your retirement account are generally non-accessible, at least, not without paying taxes and penalties and/or proving a hardship. If you need funds during your divorce to pay temporary bills, such as rent for an apartment or attorney fees, you may want to temporarily discontinue your contributions. However, every extra dollar you have is an extra dollar you could be paying to your spouse as alimony or child support, or to your spouse’s attorney for fees, and may be counted as income for calculating long-term child support, alimony or ability to pay bills. So, if you are going to free up your funds by temporarily discontinuing your retirement contributions, be sure the funds go to a legitimate debt, plan to resume your contributions as soon as practicable (probably after your divorce), and be prepared to explain what the extra boost in your income should not count for long-term calculations.

 

Contributing Too Much: Do not pour every dollar into your retirement account in an effort to avoid paying alimony or child support. The divorce court may, and often does, assume that you are upping the contributions to avoid a support obligation, which you probably are, and will treat you as if you still have the dollars in your pocket. This means, you will be required to pay support at a presumably higher level, even though you do not have the dollars actually available at net income, and you may find yourself dipping into retirement, and paying taxes and penalties to boot, just to pay the support you could have paid had you not decided to contribute more.

 

Two Dollars In, One Dollar Out: In most states, each spouse’s retirement account is divided for the marital portion, generally meaning the value that accrued between the date of marriage and the date of divorce. The portion may be equal, or more or less, depending on your state’s laws and the factors in your case, and a prenup or postnup may govern how much, if any, to actually divide. As you begin thinking through the divorce process, you should start with the assumption that every two dollars you put in will result in one dollar going to your wife. Talk to an attorney about each spouse’s rights to a share of the account, as well as the manner and method of division (Does the now ex get cash? Does the now ex have to wait until I retire? Etc.) But keep in mind that, even if    the account is divided equally, you still have funds, one dollar for every two, for yourself, too.

 

And what about your spouse’s accounts? The same pros and cons apply. Make sure you are watchful of what your spouse does, so you get what’s due to you.

ARE YOU TERRIFED OF YOUR SPOUSE’S ATTORNEY?: Tips for Successful Trial Testimony



Are you terrified of your spouse’s attorney?


Well, maybe “terrified” is too strong a descriptor – or, rather, too strong to admit feeling. But, if you are, whether or not you admit it, the feeling is normal – particularly if trial is on the horizon. Perhaps you had a bad experience during your deposition, when the attorney (who you refuse to call by name, using simply “him” or “her” ever since) quizzed you about your bank accounts. Perhaps you get annoyed reading “his” or “her” letters to your attorney, a diatribe about all of the things you allegedly did wrong during parenting time.  Perhaps you hate the way crowds part as “he” or “she” storms into the courtroom, an old leather briefcase in one hand and a pen in the other,  looking for your spouse so the two of them can sit together and jot down all of the nasty questions they plan to ask you.


Or perhaps you’ve never spoken to her attorney, but you’ve heard, mostly from her, how much he will “get you” and how “tough” he is.


Or perhaps you’ve never testified, but you’ve had nightmares about a cross examination that goes something like the bullying between Jack Nicholson and Tom Cruise in A Few Good Men. 
The phrases “I want the truth!” and “You can’t handle the truth!” haunt you.


Take it from a trial attorney, sometimes we do look for those Nicholson-Cruise moments, the kind that get our opponent frazzled and force the lies she’s been weaving in three hours’ testimony to unravel and reveal the truth – my guy really isn’t as bad as she says.


But, we can tell when a witness is prepared. Those are the toughest witnesses to crack, and, most of the time, they do not crack. They are calm, cool and collected. They know their facts. They can look us and the judge face-to-face, speak eloquently and sincerely about their family, their children, and so forth. And they can be, and usually are, more persuasive than the attorneys representing them.


Here are the things you should do to be one of these tough witnesses, too:


One Month Before Trial

Get your game plan together with your attorney.


Schedule a meeting for at least one hour (really, at least) to establish goals for your trial, to outline who will testify when, to identify witnesses who will attend voluntarily and which your attorney must subpoena, and to determine which exhibits you have, which your attorney will obtain and which you will provide. Many clients keep a trial notebook that is divided into categories for property, parenting time, employment, and miscellaneous records, and so forth, and includes a notepad for communicating with the attorney during trial. You should gather all of your information in one place so that you and your attorney can refer to records on-the-spot.


If you have not already done so, visit the courtroom where you will testify. If your judge holds public hearings (and most do), try to attend a hearing so that you can see the judge in action and get a feel for his or her tone of voice, courtroom procedures and treatment of attorneys, parties and witnesses. Get acclimated to the environment so that the fact of being in a courtroom is not jarring the day of trial. For attorneys, a courtroom is a second home. It is a familiar place to us. But, for most people, a courtroom is like a hospital waiting room – no one wants to be there, and everyone wants out. The last thing you need when you are testifying is the distraction of large chandeliers, wooden benches, musty books and/or paintings of old judges on the walls. So visit the courtroom early, and get used to it.


Be sure to budget for trial. Have a frank discussion with your attorney about the time and expense involved, and plan accordingly. Trial can be costly, but it is not quite as intimidating or expense, if done correctly, as most clients assume. For example, you may plan your vacation days from work around trial (what a vacation that will be). As another example, you may bring copies of pertinent records to your attorney’s office, rather than pay an assistant to make copies. You should discuss your budget early and often with your attorney, and no later than one month before trial.

 

One Week Before Trial

            Rehearse, rehearse, and rehearse.


            Meet with your attorney for a dress rehearsal of your testimony. If you can rehearse outside the comfort of your attorney’s office, do it. You might reserve a room in a shared office space, use another attorney’s office or, better yet, go to the courthouse. Have you attorney ask you typical trial questions for a direct examination and the dreaded cross examination. Now, your attorney cannot tell you what to say, but your attorney should advise you as to the speed, sincerity and relevance of the things you do say. For example, rather than say “I want custody because these kids are half mine” (which is a legitimate feeling), your attorney might suggest that you say “I want custody of my children because they are my children and I have done X, Y and Z with them.” Details matter. And the details come through a dress rehearsal.


            At home, study the way you speak. Practice speaking slowly and keeping eye contact with your listener. Imagine the listener is the judge or attorney. Most people speak quickly and in a slightly higher-pitch when testifying, which suggests worrying, fearfulness or lying. Practice speaking slowly and in your normal tone.


            Often, review your notes to commit pertinent facts to memory. These include dates, names of family members and, for cases involving children, medical histories, education histories and names of friends, teachers, doctors and babysitters. Nothing destroys a witness’s credibility quite like forgetting his child’s pediatrician’s name in a Nicholson-Cruise moment. You should review these facts throughout your case, but no less than one week before trial.


One Day Before Trial

            Rest.


            With the anticipating, the tension, and the constant need to pay attention to the words of every witness, to name a few things, trial is exhausting. Get plenty of sleep. If you can take a day off from work, do it. Review your notebook, and go to bed early. If nerves have the best of you, lighten up on the morning coffee and opt for a drink with less caffeine. If you need to go for an early morning run or to the gym, do it. You should practice staying calm throughout your case, but most of all the day before trial.


The morning of, arrive to the courthouse early, have a seat in the courtroom where you will testify and briefly review your notebook. Most of all BE CONFIDENT! You have spent weeks preparing for this day, and it will show.


So, rather than have your spouse’s attorney “get you” a la A Few Good Men, you’ll show them both who’s boss.

SHOULD WE TAKE A BREAK? DO’S AND DON’TS FOR TRIAL SEPARATIONS


News stories of Arnold Schwarzenegger’s “love child” kicked-off what has become an annual ritual: the confessing of the unfaithful politician. “This has been a time of great personal and professional transition for each of us,” his joint statement with wife Maria Shriver read. Understandable. A thirteen-year-old secret that has been growing up in your household, with your marital children, would cause a great personal and professional transition. It is also good media gossip, like something out of a Hollywood movie (except I doubt Schwarzenegger will be saying “I’ll be back” to this one).


But what has been glossed-over in this media gossip is a more common, less interesting but more problematic, concept -- a trial separation. “At this time, we are living apart while we work on the future of our relationship,” their statement went on to read. Is that a good idea? Sometimes, carefully; but, often, no.


A trial separation is a break, from your spouse, from “it all,” to determine whether you are going through a low point in your marriage or should divorce. At first blush, it sounds like a good idea. No one wants to spend money divorcing needlessly, particularly when money is in short supply to begin with. But, if you are not careful, that separation to help you determine whether to divorce can snowball into the biggest problem in your divorce. Here’s why:


Don’t publicize it – Tell someone you are getting a divorce, and suddenly everyone has something to say. You’ll hear horror stories, preaching, “legal advice” (c/o Google), all kinds of things, most of them inaccurate or exaggerated. And that means people are talking about you and your spouse. Like the game “telephone,” what you say will come back to you contorted, and your spouse will have heard it, too. That often perpetuates a divorce. So, leave your Facebook status alone, skip the public statement and keep to yourselves.


Do tell close family – You should, however, tell close family that you and your spouse are separating. By “close,” I mean the family members you can trust, your confidants. Be up-front about your plans so they are not surprised. Tell them what to say to your kids, of what not to say to them, if anything at all. This is a time to rely on your family for help – financially, morally and otherwise – so keep them informed.


Don’t move out – Move out of your home, and your chances of retaining even equal time with your children or your precious belongings are slim to none. Those news stories about couples living in separate homes and sharing time with the kids are just that – stories. It rarely happens in real life, and it probably does not happen much in Hollywood life, either. To a judge, you look like the parent who gave up and the spouse who evidently did not care much about the baseball card collection to take it with you when you up-and-left. Judges rarely care how helpful you thought you would be by letting your wife stay with the kids or how much you intended to return to retrieve your belongings –your wife, who’s angling to keep the kids and your stuff, will make you out to be nothing more than an abandoner.


Do see the kids if you do – If you have already moved out of the house, or have no other choice, then make a schedule to see your kids and stick to it. Have them spend overnights with you. If you do divorce, then you will have already established a pattern for parenting and shown your ability to provide for your children in a new environment. A parenting pattern and your ability to provide are two key factors a judge will consider when deciding who receives custody.


Don’t maintain the status quo – You might agree to pay the bills for your wife while you rent a one-bedroom apartment (the expenses can’t be that bad, right?), but you are fitting yourself for disaster if one of you files for divorce later. For one thing, if she really needs a job, you give her no incentive to get one. Moreover, by continuing to pay the mortgage, the insurance, the utilities, the grocery bill, etc., you are making her case for alimony. You send the message that you can support her, even if you can’t, and are comfortable doing it, even if you aren’t. the better thing to do is determine, before you separate, who is responsible for what bill, put the bill in that person’s name (if possible), and follow-up to make sure the bill is paid.


Do open a separate bank account – It’s amazing how many guys will move out of the house but keep their pay direct-deposited to their joint account for their wife’s use. This might make sense, if she traditionally paid all the bills, but it’s no good if she’s getting ready to file for divorce.    She has complete control over your money, and she could easily, and probably will, withdraw all of it right before she files – leaving you with a cent or two, or maybe an overdraft fee. While you are separated, open a separate account and put some money there for reserve – you’ll need if things get ugly.


Don’t date just to date – A trial separation is supposed to be a time to discover what you want, but that does not mean you have to test-out different women. Take this time to reflect on your marriage and your goals, and leave the casual dating alone. Otherwise, you could end up with your own “love child” and an unintended reason to get a divorce.


Do be honest about a new relationship – If you have met someone, however, be honest about it. Most States are “no-fault” divorce States, which means a girlfriend (including one you cheated with) makes not one difference. Even when an affair does matter, it matters only slightly or        in cases of egregious sleeping-around that has confused your children and left you penniless. In other words, it is a limited consideration. It is a sad thing, but a true one, that marriages fall apart. That does not make you a bad person. If you have found someone else and believe it is time to move on, you are better off being honest about it than lying the rest of your marriage, to your family, your kids and yourself.


Don’t delay the inevitable – The separation should be a short time to reflect. Believe it or not, many go on for years, both spouses waiting for the other to make the first move. The problem is, neither is happy, and one spouse (probably you) is stuck paying the bills.


Finally, do have a separation agreement – Define the parameters of your trial separation. Who will pay what bills? Are you allowed to date? To pick up the kids from school (you should)? To come home? How long will you wait before making the decision to divorce or reconcile? Will you go to counseling? Will you cancel joint credit cards (you should)?  What is the best way to communicate with your spouse (phone, e-mail, text)?


Although, in some States, your separation agreement before a divorce begins will not replace an agreement to divide your property and debts made during your divorce, it is a good precedent. And it is a lot better than separating for an undefined time waiting for your marriage to work itself out like one of those Hollywood movies.





CREATIVE SOLUTIONS TO COMMON DIVORCE DILEMMAS - Part 3

 

How Will I Know My Kids Are Safe?

If you have ever lost sleep wondering how to keep your children safe during your ex’s parenting time, you are not alone. This is, hands down, the most common parenting time question. Call it parental instinct, loss of control of plain distrust, parents do not like the reality that they cannot be there every minute of parenting time restoring harmony like a graceful dove -- they look like pesky pigeons instead. Nevertheless, you can negotiate a parenting time plan that includes protective provisions. Consider these provisions, which you can enforce in most states with a contempt motion:

 

For transportation: Each party should be responsible for providing and paying for transportation during that party’s parenting time. If necessary and due to reasonable work schedule conflicts or unavoidable and reasonable personal schedule conflicts, the party may select another properly licensed adult known to the child to provide transportation. The party must personally give advance notice to the other party when possible, and the party will have a first right of refusal to provide transportation instead.

 

For parenting time pick-up and drop-off delays: Parenting time must be exercised in a prompt manner. If necessary due to an emergency or a reasonable schedule conflict, a thirty minute delay is allowed. The delayed party must personally give advance notice to the other party when possible.

 

For communicating with your children during parenting time: Each party must provide the other party with a phone contact where the children and the party can be reached at all times during parenting time. The parties may not abuse phone contact privileges but may call the children at reasonable times.

 

For parenting time modifications: The parties should be encouraged to make arrangements to exchange parenting time to allow the children to attend special events and activities with extended family members and to cooperate with each other to allow the children to spend such other time with the other party as the children desire. However, where applicable for purposes of calculating child support, only ordered overnights will be considered.

 

What If My Spouse Will Nit-Pick Every Parenting Time Problem?

Post-divorce parenting time litigation is a nightmare, and an expensive one featuring police reports, successive court motions, photographs and a deluge of he said/she said testimony. Maybe your soon to-be-ex brings a tape recorder and her mother to every parenting time exchange, in her words “Just in case.” (“In case what?” you think, baffled.) Maybe your spouse locks her front door and refuses to let you pick up your children because you are fifteen minutes late. (Thank you, traffic pile up on I-60.) Or maybe your spouse is so bent on following every word in your order, verbatim, that she has multiple copies highlighted and tabbed and can recite provisions from heart.

 

Whatever the reason, if you fear you will litigate parenting time problems unnecessarily post-divorce, consider negotiating an informal dispute resolution agreement. The limits to your creativity depend on the laws in your state. For example, in Michigan, families can agree to attend family law mediation, but not if either party alleges or there has been a history of domestic violence between the parties or either party and the children. Contact your attorney or your court clerk to learn what informal dispute resolutions services are available to you.

 

Then, include them in a provision like this: The parties are encouraged to use the informal enforcement, mediation and counseling resources at X [name your place] to resolve any problems with parenting time before filing a motion for contempt, a motion to show cause or other formal motion, unless warranted by the circumstances and laws at the time, with this Court. Either party may cite this provision to compel the other party to use these resources in the event the party files a motion with this Court first.

 

Remember, divorce courts do enforce property settlement agreements even if they would not have crafted them at trial, and divorce courts routinely allow unique parenting time plans if the parents agree the plans are in their children’s best interests. See, e.g. Hamilton v Hamilton,647 So 2d 756; 1994 Ala Civ App LEXIS 441 (1994). Therefore, get creative with your settlement options.

 

Your alternative? Becoming a Bill in a costly battle for cat custody.

CREATIVE SOLUTIONS TO COMMON DIVORCE DILEMMAS - Part 2

 

What Do We Do With The Timeshare or Vacation Week?

That timeshare or vacation week you bought as newlyweds for Spring Break has broken your settlement negotiations, huh?  If you can sell and make a profit, do it. You will spend more money in attorney fees arguing who gets to go on vacation when than the vacation is worth. More often, however, parties cannot sell. What can you do?

 

If you have children, build the timeshare or vacation week into a parenting time schedule. Each parent will take the children on vacation on a rotating schedule. For example, if you have one week in the summer, Mom will take the children on even years and Dad on odd years.

 

If you do not have children, again, consider awarding the timeshare or vacation week to one party and moving forward. This may include awarding the other party an offset from other marital property, so be sure to value it appropriately. Your financial expert is your best friend here – you might even enter a stipulation with your spouse to retain one expert who will produce a binding value. That way, you save time and attorney fees arguing over competing values.

 

Or, you might flip a coin. I had a client do that. She lost – but she did take considerable joy in seeing the judge add a coin flip provision to her divorce decree, to her ex-husband’s resentment and rolling eyes.

CREATIVE SOLUTIONS TO COMMON DIVORCE DILEMMAS - PART 1

 

I met Bill early in my career. He was my first quirky client. I had heard about clients like him in law school, the kind who fret over the small stuff, who never stick to one decision (do you want the red plates or the blue ones?), who call in the morning sobbing and in the afternoon, for no apparent reason, elated, who show up unannounced at 5:30pm on a Friday with a trunk full of paperwork to review rightaway because life depends on it. I thought, then, these clients were figments of real clients, their faults merely magnified by the passage of time, not real people. But then I met Bill.

 

Bill’s quirk was custody – for his cats. He and his wife, Stella, were retired. Their children had children of their own. They were homebodies and caregivers both. Their two cats were their replacement children.

 

Now, Bill and Stella were not your typical cat-crazy couple. No, no; they were much worse. These cats had complete wardrobes for spring, summer, winter and fall. They had velvet bedding. They posed for annual photos; like school pictures Stella arranged them neatly in the living room. They ate supper, and only the best meat. They were, as you might imagine, fat fur balls and wildly selfish. But Bill and Stella loved them. 

 

The problem was, they loved them too much. Those cats were the hold-up in our settlement.

 

I never thought I would spend hours negotiating who got which cat when. I did, not because I wanted to but because it took time to convince Bill to think creatively. He was not the creative type. I had to coax him into thinking of alternatives to what came, at least to his mind, naturally – child custody for cats. That was impracticable, silly, and likely unenforceable in his court. What we did come up with, though, was an agreement he saw as benevolent and in his cats’ best interests – they would remain at home with Stella (he was moving out for a retired-man’s bachelor pad in the swanky part of town), but Stella would buy him a new cat of his own. The financial insignificance aside, Bill saw this agreement as an opportunity for him to start anew, new cat child and all.

 

You may not have a cat custody dilemma like Bill’s in your divorce, but settlement-stalling dilemmas can occur. Here are some creative solutions. How creative can you be?

 

Who Gets The Pet?

So, your pet has become a member of your family, complete with holiday wardrobe, special treats and all. For pet lovers, what happens to your pet when you divorce may be a significant issue, as it was for Bill. For non-pet lovers, what happens to your pet may still be a significant issue. For example, where the family pets reside may affect which parent will receive primary physical custody of the children. In a Delaware case from 2002, the divorce court awarded primary physical custody to a father whose home environment offered his children greater physical and mental stability – notably, the children had a dog, two cats and fish there. Martin v Martin, 820 A2d 410; 2002 Del Fam Ct LEXIS 7 (2002). What can you do if your pets stall your settlement?

 

If you have children, award the pets to the party retaining primary physical custody. Undoubtedly, your children have grown attached to their pets. Think how overbearing you will appear in court if you insist that Fluffy and Zuzu stay with you, little Fankie and Susie’s attachment to them aside. Moreover, pets have an amazing capacity to soothe; they will help your children cope with the divorce process, during and after. The same is true for children commuting between parents. If you share physical custody, consider transporting the pets with the children. Make a game of it. The children can pack an overnight bag, bring a journal to write down what Pinky did at Dad’s House, what Pink did at Mom’s House, plan activities with the pets, and so forth. Your options are limited to your creativity.

 

If you do not have children, consider awarding the pets to one party and moving forward. For Bill, this meant purchasing a new pet.

 

For another client, this meant setting up a pet trust to ensure his ex would have resources to care for his beloved dog and, if not, he would receive them A pet trust is a legally sanctioned arrangement that provides for the care and maintenance of a pet in the event of the owner’s death or disability. Under traditional trust and estate law, a pet owner could not establish a trust for a pet because trusts benefit people, not property. (Sorry, pet lovers, but pets are property.) However, by 2009, 42 states had adopted laws allowing trusts for pets. A person called the “settlor” contributes property (usually cash) to the trust for the “trustee” to manage and expend for the pet’s benefit. The settlor and the trustee may be the same person, and in most states the trust may continue for the animal’s life or for 21 years, whichever comes first. See, e.g., Uniform Trust Code § 408.

THREE TRICKY LANGUAGE TRAPS TO AVOID

LegalConsult.png


Chances are, at some point in your case you will be responsible for reviewing, and drafting, all or a portion of an order or judgment. Certainly, when  your case settles you and your attorney, if you have one, will share in drafting the settlement documents, some of which your judge will sign, with your ex and her attorney.  In many jurisdictions, judges also require attorneys and parties to prepare judgments and orders based on the judge’s rulings at a hearing or trial, as well.


For parties who are unrepresented, this task poses a serious problem – you are responsible for drafting legal documents with very little, if any, legal knowledge. And although some jurisdiction offer free or low cost assistance via help desks, online tutorials and law students, these pale by comparison to a seasoned attorney who has been drafting documents for years.


This is because we attorneys are crafty in our language. Orders and judgments and contracts that bind lives – yours, you ex’s and your family’s – and are meant to last a lifetime. For this reason, we are very particular about the language we use and what that language means. Although these documents should be drafted to be readable, the language more often than not incorporates meanings that, unless you consulted an attorney, you will probably not realize.


That is, until you are trying to enforce a document that you find means more or less than what you expected. Take these three trick language traps as examples:


1.  “By Mutual Agreement.” Often times, your order or judgment will require cooperation with your ex after your separation. For example, you may have to cooperate to sell your home after your divorce. As another example, you may have to communicate with each other before scheduling extra curricular activities for your children during each other’s parenting time. If you see the phrase “by mutual agreement,” you would, naturally, conclude that you and your ex must work to agree mutually. However, such is not the case. “By mutual agreement” means that you and your ex will not do Y unless, and only if, the two of you agree. One of you may disagree for any reason or no reason at all, good or bad. If you disagree, then you are not doing Y. Period. To require cooperation, such that your judge can conclude one of you is acting in bad faith, the better phrase to use is “by mutual and reasonable agreement.” With this phrase, your ex must have a reasonable excuse for disagreeing, not any at all.


2.  “Incorporated.”  For cases involving confidential settlement agreements, the judge often signs a shorter document (for the public record) that references the agreement (which remains private). If you see the word “incorporate” in that shorter document, then you would, logically, conclude that the document is adopting the confidential settlement agreement and can enforce it even if the same terms to not appear in the shorter public document. You would be correct. But wait! Enforce how? In many jurisdictions, the word “incorporate” means that the confidential agreements remains its own binding and independent contract, a contract that is enforceable under the rules with respect to contracts – complete with longer statutes of limitation, civil lawsuits and penalties for defaults. By comparison, the phrase “incorporated and merged” makes the confidential agreement a part of the judgment, with far fewer remedies for enforcing judgments, such as a shorter statute or limitation, in the event of default.


3. “Reasonable Rights of Parenting Time.” For dads, this is usually the biggest trap of all. “Reasonable rights of parenting time” sounds appealing – you will have reasonable parenting time, and the right rather than the option to that time, with your child. Many dads sign off on documents containing this phrase with the mistaken belief that reasonable time is better than the severely limited – or no – time that they have during their case. Not so fast! In most jurisdictions, the phrase “reasonable rights of parenting time” has a specific definition. In Michigan, for example, it usually means alternate weekends and one afternoon during the week – that is, a whole 52 overnights and 52 afternoons for the entire year. Add in a few holidays, and dad has less than 25% of the year to spend with his child.  If you did not consult a handbook at the courthouse, you would not have known otherwise by just this vague language. So, be sure to write down in your order or judgment the specific parenting time schedule you have in mind.


And, as you can imagine, these are but a few of the tricky language traps attorneys use. When faced with them, then, what should you do? The best course of action is to have an attorney review all of your documents with you and make sure, together, that you understand each and every word.


With or without an attorney, however, take your time, take notes, do your homework, ask questions, and make sure the contract that will bind your life is the one you understand.


SHOULD WE TRY A TEMPORARY SEPARATION?3 RISKS YOU MAY NOT HAVE ANTICIPATED

 

If you’re thinking about a temporary separation, to see if your marriage is reconcilable, then you’ve probably read our articles about the risks. On the one hand, a temporary separation allows you and your spouse some space to think about what you each truly want out of your marriage. On the other hand, a temporary separation can easily transform into a new, and bad, status quo, one in which you have doubled your living expenses and have removed yourself from your children, if you have them, and/or have set a pattern of supporting your soon-to-be-ex. While they may be helpful for the short run, every day must bring the two of you closer together or further apart –otherwise, the risks of confusing your children, establishing a support pattern and setting expectations that you will be the secondary, or “visiting,” parent take over.

 

Those are the most obvious risks, but there are less obvious, but just as common, risks, too:

 

Accumulating Assets – While you are separated, you should assume that any asset you and/or your spouse acquire, except some gifts and entirely segregated inheritances, are marital property to be divided equally between the two of you. This means, the furniture you bought to outfit your new place, your new TV, your contributions to your 401k, your interests in your pension, and so forth, are eligible for division – even after, in most states, a lengthy separation. This rule is not intuitive because most spouses will expect that their property rights were defined at the time they separated, since their decision to divorce is, in their minds, really an extension of their decision to separate. However, in most states, the rule is property is to be divided if it came to be between the date of the marriage and the date of the divorce, NOT the date of separation. While some states allow judges to fix the date at an earlier date, such as the date of separation or some date in between when it became clear the couple would not reconcile, this is but an exception to the rule. What’s worse – if you stop contributions toward your retirement to get around this rule, most states will treat your actions as “in anticipation of divorce” and will divide your retirement as if you had made those contributions. The best approach, therefore, is to make the separation short and decide soon whether to reconcile or file for divorce.

 

 Unanticipated Debts – Similarly, in most states, the debts either you or your spouse acquire are still considered marital debts to be divided between the two of you as of the date of divorce – again, not as of the date of separation. This may be intuitive for debts like the credit card the two of you have been using for gas, a medical expense for your child, or the home mortgage, but what about anticipated debts like a home repair while your spouse has resided in the home or a vehicle repair that went on a credit card or credit card spending your spouse claims is “all for the family” but you cannot track? Yes, in most states these too would be marital debt. While some states allow judges to fix the date to divide debts as of some other date, and to identify some debts as “purely personal” (after your time and money spent explaining to the judge why), this too is the exception and not the rule. You should assume that any debts your spouse acquires while you are separated from her are one-half yours.

 

Tax Filing Status – Unfortunately, these unanticipated consequences can, and often do, carry over to tax season. There is no rule that spouses must file their federal tax return with the status “married, filing jointly,” which is, generally, the most preferred tax filing status. Rather, either spouse may file with the status “married, filing separately” and take advantage of his or her own deductions, exemptions and refunds. If you and your spouse are not on speaking terms, you may no discover this separate filing until you file your return – long after he or she has claimed items for the home, and the children, and long after spending your  refund.

 

Then what are you to do if you and your spouse still intend to separate temporarily? First, establish a firm deadline for the separation – a month, two, etc. – at which time you will either reconcile or one of you will file for divorce. The longer your separation goes, the greater these risks grow. Second, consider a separation agreement. In some states, judges will enforce these as contracts, and in a minority they will not, but, either way, you and your spouse have set forth your expectations. (If you do not believe she will honor them, that is another sign you should file for divorce.)

 

Most of all, exercise caution every day of your separation – assume your assets during that time are one-half your spouse’s, her debts are one-half yours and taxes will be in-issue, and decide relatively soon to file for divorce if every day you are not growing closer together as a couple.

 


DESERVED APOLOGY OR DANGEROUS ADMISSION?:THE SECRET COST TO SAYING “I’M SORRY”

 

Another public personality, shame-faced and sullen, said “I’m sorry” to an angrily silent room, his endorsers and busy cameras this past week. Whether you love him or hate him, believed him or could care less, Tiger Woods broadcast his apology worldwide to his wife, Elin Nordegren, and to you. According to personality and crisis communication experts like W. Timothy Coombs, Ph.D., who recently spoke to Time Magazine about “the apology,” a public apology like his is a good thing because it conveys regret, ownership for the past and a commitment to change future behavior to wife, family, friends and, for you famous wrong-doers, fans. These are “all the key elements of an effective apology,” says Coombs.

 

Maybe for Tiger Woods.

 

For you, those words you think are a deserved apology could be a dangerous admission.

 

The tossed-about phrase with non-lawyers is, “It’s hearsay; it can’t come in.” Wrong. In most jurisdictions, your statements are admissions that the court may admit into evidence against you as substantive evidence (i.e., for the truth of the matter asserted) and to impeach your in-court testimony (i.e., to make you look like a liar).

 

“Hearsay” is an out-of-court statement or assertive conduct offered into evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted. Hearsay is inadmissible as substantive evidence unless a hearsay exception applies. Hearsay exceptions include dying declarations, excited utterances, learned treatises, present sense impressions, and tens of others for each jurisdiction. For example, witness John could not testify that “I heard X tell Y that the defendant killed the victim” unless a hearsay exception applied (perhaps X yelled in a fit of excitement). A lawyer in your jurisdiction can explain the exceptions applicable to your case.

 

Admissions are a party’s out-of-court statements or assertive conduct, and they are non-hearsay if one party offers them against the other party. In other words, defendant husband’s statement is not hearsay if plaintiff wife offers it against him. All jurisdictions characterize these statements as non-hearsay. Therefore, they are not subject to the hearsay rules, and the proponent need not find one of those tens of hearsay exceptions to apply before offering it into evidence. See, e.g., MRE 801(d)(1).

 

The party may offer the admission into substantive evidence, i.e. to prove the matter asserted. For example, revenge-drive plaintiff wife’s lawyer could admit a tape recording of remorseful defendant husband apologizing for “gambling away our savings” or “taking that trip with my secretary because I didn’t care what you and the kids did at Christmas,” which husband thought wife would appreciate, this sincere apology, to prove that husband gambled the parties to debt or cares more about sex than his children. And all of that to husband’s dismay – all he thought he did was apologize.


There are, as one would expect in the law, always exceptions. For example, admissions are not admissible into substantive evidence if they are made in connection with a criminal case later expunged, plea negotiations, settlement discussions or certain civil infractions. See, e.g., Pizzillo v Pizzillo, 884 SW2d 749 (Tenn Ct App 1994) (memorandum of father’s admissions to child abuse in criminal case could not be admitted into evidence in later divorce case when criminal case record expunged).

 

More often, however, these out-of-court statements are the common type: e-mails; Facebook messages; YouTube videos; letters; voicemails; confessions at the holiday party. These are ripe for admission into evidence as party-opponent admissions.

 

Unfortunately, when, like Tiger Woods, spouses face mounting proof and/or wild accusations of an affair, the temptation to speak up is great. What should you say if you want to say, “I’m sorry”? For get the “I’m sorry for sleeping with other women and neglecting you and the children” apology a la Tiger Woods. Try these “friendly” admissions instead:

 

In Therapy: If your dirty deeds are driving you crazy, talk to a psychologist. In many jurisdictions, your conversations with a psychologist are privileged. The purpose of this privilege is to protect the confidential nature of the relationship between the psychologist and the patient, and only the patient (in our scenario, you) may waive it and permit the psychologist to testify. See, e.g., Jack v Jack, 239 NW2d 231 (Mich Ct App 2000). Not all jurisdictions recognize this privilege, so be sure to discuss your therapy plans with your lawyer first.

 

In Church: If your moral transgressions are dying for confession, go to church. In most jurisdictions, your conversations with your church leader (whatever the denomination, be he the Pope or the free-wheeling multi-denominational type) are also privileged. The purpose of the clergy-penitent privilege, like the psychologist-patient privilege, is to protect a relationship our society has long treated as confidential (indeed, in this scenario, sacred). So long as you make the confession to the church leader in his or her professional capacity and in accordance with your religion’s discipline, it is protected, and only you may waive it. See, e.g., People v Lipsczinska, 180 NW 617 (Mich 1920). Be sure to discuss your plans, but perhaps not the actual confession, with your lawyer first because not all jurisdictions recognize the privilege for every religion.

 

In The Child’s Best Interests: If therapy and church just will not do, be sure to keep any confession focused on your children’s best interests. Think about every statement you make and ask yourself, “Would this sound bad in court?” and “How can I make this sound good, yet be sincere?” For example, forget, “I’m sorry I spent the weekend with Shelly and not the kids.” Go with, “I’m sorry I had a momentary lapse in judgment; I am usually so focused on spending the weekend with the kids, as I have repeatedly during our marriage.”

 

The best practice, however, is to say nothing at all. Lawyers have a crafty way of twisting words, and even the well-intentioned apology could turn into a costly confession in court.

 

Let the desire for an apology give way to the goal in your case: the best outcome for you and your children. That means forgoing apologies you think are deserved to set yourself on good ground in court, because your spouse’s lawyer will turn them into dangerous admissions.

 

Remember, you are not Tiger Woods with a public persona and endorsements to salvage – and, if you are, maybe you too should have taken this advice.