• Full Website
Menu

Pinnacle Family Law Blog

"Strength, knowledge, and compassion when it matters most."
  • Full Website

CONTEMPT FOR NOT PAYING CHILD SUPPORT? YES, IT HAPPENS.

January 20, 2016

  Debtors prisons are illegal in Michigan, but that does not stop some support recipients and courts from threatening incarceration if a payor does not pay-up.    

         The moving party needs to prove that (1) a support order exists, (2) the payor had notice of entry of the order, and (3) an arrearage exists.[1] The family court may find the payor in contempt if the court finds that the payor is in arrears and that (1) the payor has the capacity to pay all or some of the amount due through the exercise of diligence, MCL 552.635(1)(a); (2) the payor has failed to obtain a source of income and has failed to participate in a work activity after referral by the Friend of the Court,    MCL 552.635(1)(b); or (3) the payor has the capacity to pay out of currently available resources, MCL 552.633(1).

            If the claim is that the payor has currently available resources, the court may presume, in the absence of proofs to the contrary, that the payor has currently available resources equal to four weeks of payments. It may not find the payor has more than four weeks of payments without proof of those resources by the Friend of the Court or the recipient.[2]

            Among the factors that may be considered in determining the ability to pay are the following:

  • employment history

  • education and skills

  • work opportunities

  • attempts to find work

  • the payor’s personal history, including marital status and means of support

  • real and personal assets and any transfer of assets to another

  • efforts to modify the decree if it is considered excessive under the circumstances

  • health and physical ability for gainful employment

  • availability for work

  • the payor’s location since the judgment and reasons for moving, if applicable[3]

            If the payor is found in contempt because he or she has the capacity to pay out of available resources, the court may enter an order to do one or more of the following:

  • commit the payor to the county jail or an alternative to jail or other penal or correctional facility

  • commit the payor to the county jail or an alternative to jail with work-release provisions

  • condition a suspension of a driver’s license, an occupational license, a recreational or sporting license, or any combination of these licenses on noncompliance with an order for a scheduled payment of the arrearage

  • order the payor to participate in a work activity

  • order the payor to participate in a community corrections program if available within the court’s jurisdiction

  • order the payor to pay a fine of not more than $100

  • place the payor under the Friend of the Court’s supervision for a term fixed by the court with reasonable conditions, including requiring the payor to participate in a parenting program or a work program; to participate in drug, alcohol, or other counseling; to seek employment; to continue compliance with a current support or parenting time order; or to enter into and comply with an arrearage payment plan[4]

 

[1]           Sword v Sword, 399 Mich 367; 249 NW2d 88 (1976).

 

[2]           MCL 552.633.

[3]           See Sword, 399 Mich at 378–379. (These considerations are also used in income imputation. Rohloff v Rohloff, 161 Mich App 766; 411 NW2d 484 (1987).)

 

[4]           MCL 552.633(1).

[5]           MCL 257.321c(3), 324.43559(3), 338.3434.

[6]           MCL 552.630.

Tags Child Support
ARREARS FORGIVENESS PROGRAM - DISCHARGE OF STATE OWED ARREARS →

Latest & Greatest

You must select a collection to display.

Fresh Tweets


This is a block field

You can put any content in here.

Etiam porta sem malesuada magna mollis euismod. Vestibulum id ligula porta felis euismod semper. Maecenas sed diam eget risus varius blandit sit amet non magna. Vestibulum id ligula porta felis euismod semper.

Powered by Squarespace